May 8, 2025
Table of Contents
In today’s volatile economic environment, comparing asset backed securities vs mortgage backed securities have become a key comparison for investors seeking stability, predictable income, and diversification. As we move through 2025, fixed-income investments remain attractive, but understanding how ABS and MBS differ — and which offers better value — is more important than ever.
Both asset backed securities and mortgage backed securities provide opportunities to earn income through structured finance, yet they differ in underlying assets, risk exposure, yield potential, and market behavior. According to a report by Fitch Ratings, the outlook for structured finance is cautiously optimistic with ABS providing diversification benefits, while MBS remains sensitive to interest rate shifts and housing trends.
For investors and financial professionals alike, evaluating the nuances of ABS vs MBS is critical to building a robust fixed-income portfolio. This blog breaks down what are asset backed securities and what are mortgage backed securities, explores their risk-return profiles, and helps you decide where to place your capital in 2025.
Asset backed securities (ABS) are investment products backed by pools of non-mortgage financial assets such as auto loans, credit card debt, student loans, and equipment leases. Investors in ABS receive payments generated by the cash flows of these underlying assets.

The global ABS securities market was valued at over $2.5 trillion in 2023 and continues to grow as investors seek alternatives to traditional fixed-income options. The appeal of consistent returns, especially in higher interest rate environments, supports increased issuance and demand.
ABS are ideal for investors aiming for steady income streams from consumer or business credit portfolios, particularly those who want to diversify beyond real estate exposure.
Mortgage backed securities (MBS) are bonds secured by pools of residential or commercial mortgages. The underlying borrowers repay their mortgage loans, and those payments (principal and interest) are passed through to MBS investors.
Despite these risks, mortgage backed securities continue to be essential tools for income-focused investors and institutions. Their ability to generate consistent payments and fit into diverse bond strategies makes them relevant, even in shifting macroeconomic climates.
In 2025, the question of asset backed securities vs mortgage backed securities is more than just a technical distinction — it’s a strategic choice for investors navigating a landscape shaped by inflationary pressures, shifting interest rates, and evolving credit markets. Understanding this comparison allows portfolio managers and individual investors to assess where their capital is best positioned for risk-adjusted returns, stability, and growth. As fixed-income instruments regain traction, choosing the right security type can make a significant difference in portfolio resilience and yield performance.
In this section, we break down the key differences between asset backed securities vs mortgage backed securities, helping investors better understand their structure, performance, and risk exposure.

In 2025, understanding mortgage and asset backed securities structures is critical as rate volatility and credit conditions evolve. ABS offer flexibility and sector diversity, while MBS tend to align with real estate cycles.
Both ABS and MBS provide investors with opportunities to earn passive income, but their risk-return trade-offs vary. This section dives into the investment performance, liquidity, and volatility of asset backed securities vs mortgage backed securities.

In terms of yield, non-agency MBS may outperform ABS, but at the cost of higher risk and volatility. Investors must weigh their risk tolerance against potential returns.
When it comes to asset backed securities vs mortgage backed securities, the answer depends on your investment goals:
ABS securities may outperform in a stable or rising rate environment, while MBS shine when interest rates fall or housing markets boom.
In 2025, institutional demand for mortgage and asset backed securities remains robust. Portfolio managers are:
As financial instruments like ABS and MBS evolve, enterprises are increasingly exploring technologies like blockchain for enhanced transparency and auditability.
In conclusion, the ongoing comparison of asset backed securities vs mortgage backed securities in 2025 underscores a key investing principle — aligning structured finance choices with evolving market dynamics, income goals, and risk tolerance.
The debate over asset backed securities vs mortgage backed securities continues into 2025 with renewed relevance. While both offer attractive features, your ideal pick will depend on your income needs, risk appetite, and market view.
📈 For yield seekers: Non-agency MBS or lower-rated ABS tranches may suit you.
🔒 For safety: Agency MBS or senior ABS tranches can offer lower risk.
📊 For diversification: ABS lets you move beyond housing into broader consumer credit.
Ultimately, a blended approach — combining ABS securities and mortgage backed securities — might offer the best balance for modern portfolios.
🚀 Ready to navigate the world of structured finance with expert guidance? Connect with Calibraint to explore custom fintech solutions that simplify ABS and MBS investments for your business or clients.
Secondary Market Liquidity for Tokenized Assets: Infrastructure Requirements and Market Making Strategies
Enterprises embraced smart contract platforms, believing they were stepping into a future of self-governing automation. Deploy once, reduce operational dependency, and allow code to regulate the economics of trust. The theory was convincing, the pilots were flawless, and then real users, real capital, and real regulatory exposure arrived. That is the point where the economics […]
Crypto Wallet Development Implementing MPC Zero Trust and Regulatory Compliance
MPC crypto wallet development is no longer optional; it is the essential foundation for enterprises integrating digital assets, offering a paradigm shift from vulnerable single-key systems to a robust, distributed security model. By implementing Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology in wallets, organizations can eliminate the single point of failure inherent in traditional systems while simultaneously satisfying […]
The Total Cost of Ownership Gap: Smart Contract Platforms and Hidden Post Deployment Economics
Most blockchain projects begin with a simple question: How much will it cost to build? The real question should be: How much will it cost to keep alive? Smart contract development has matured, but procurement conversations haven’t. Enterprises are still negotiating build quotes, while long-term economics quietly decide which projects scale and which projects sunset. […]
Enterprises Are Losing $2M+ on Failed Blockchain Pilots Here’s the Pre-Development Checklist That Prevents It
For C-suite and innovation leaders, the conversation about Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) has changed. The question isn’t if blockchain is transformative, but how to move past the Proof-of-Concept (PoC) phase without burning capital. The tough reality is that most enterprise Blockchain Pilots never reach production. This leads to massive wasted investment. Market research confirms this […]
Crafting Biometric Crypto Wallet Development for Secure Asset Management
Recently, several groups have argued over which cryptocurrency wallet can be considered the “official” one for a presidential brand. Even members of the same family publicly disagreed. This situation reveals a simple truth: a famous name or logo does not make a secure crypto wallet trustworthy if the wrong person can access it. What truly […]
DAOs for Enterprise: How Global Companies Use Decentralized Governance to Scale Innovation
Innovation isn’t slowing because companies lack ideas; it’s slowing because ideas drown in bureaucracy before they ever reach the market. Consider a life-saving drug proposal stalled by 47 internal signatures, or an automotive innovation delayed 90 days in administrative quicksand. McKinsey reports that managers spend nearly a quarter of their time wrestling with decisions, yet […]