Hashgraph vs Blockchain – Clearly Explained

author

Calibraint

Author

September 27, 2024

Last updated: October 1, 2024

Hashgraph vs Blockchain guide

Blockchain technology has been the backbone of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, revolutionizing industries with its promise of decentralization, transparency, and security. But as more people and development companies explored distributed ledger technologies, Hashgraph found its place in the world.

If you’re not familiar with the tech world, terms like “Blockchain” and “Hashgraph” can sound pretty intimidating. But don’t worry, we’re here to break it down in simple terms! Both of these technologies help to achieve similar goals: creating secure, transparent, and decentralized systems. 

Yet, they go about it in very different ways.

In this blog, we’ll explain the key differences between Hashgraph vs Blockchain, how they work, and why some believe Hashgraph might be the next big thing. Ready to dive in?

What is Blockchain?

To understand how Blockchain compares to Hashgraph, let’s start with the basics. Blockchain is a type of distributed ledger technology (DLT) that records transactions across a network of computers (called nodes) in a way that ensures the information is secure, transparent, and immutable (unchangeable).

How Blockchain Works:

Blocks:

In a blockchain, data is stored in blocks. Each block contains a batch of transactions or information. Once the block is full, it’s added to the chain of previous blocks, hence the name “blockchain.”

Decentralization:

Blockchain operates on a decentralized network of computers (nodes), meaning there is no single authority controlling the data. Instead, all the nodes participate in verifying transactions and maintaining the ledger.

Consensus Mechanism:

Blockchain relies on consensus mechanisms like Proof of Work or Proof of History to validate transactions. For instance, in Bitcoin’s PoW system, miners solve complex mathematical puzzles to validate transactions and add new blocks.

Immutability:

Once a block is added to the blockchain, it cannot be altered or deleted. This makes blockchain highly secure, as it becomes incredibly difficult for hackers to manipulate the data.

What is Hashgraph?

Hashgraph is another type of distributed ledger technology, but it works quite differently from Blockchain. Created by Leemon Baird in 2016, Hashgraph aims to offer a more efficient and scalable alternative to blockchain.

How Hashgraph Works:

Gossip Protocol:

Hashgraph doesn’t rely on blocks or chains. Instead, it uses something called the gossip protocol. In simple terms, when a transaction happens, the information is spread quickly across the network as nodes “gossip” with each other to share data. This makes the transaction verification process much faster.

Virtual Voting:

Instead of mining or staking, Hashgraph uses a virtual voting system to achieve consensus. Each node knows about every other node’s transactions, so they can vote on which transaction happened first without needing to broadcast a vote. This virtual voting mechanism is incredibly fast and doesn’t require the same energy or resources as mining in blockchain.

Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG):

Hashgraph is based on a data structure called a Directed Acyclic Graph, which allows multiple transactions to be processed in parallel. This is one reason why Hashgraph can be faster and more scalable than blockchain.

Fairness:

Hashgraph aims to ensure fairness by guaranteeing that no single node can decide the order of transactions. It uses consensus to ensure that the order of events is agreed upon in a fair manner, avoiding any manipulation of transaction sequencing.

Here are the Key Differences Between Hashgraph vs Blockchain 

Hashgraph vs Blockchain difference

Speed and Scalability

Blockchain:

Blockchain, especially older versions like Bitcoin’s, can be relatively slow. For instance, Bitcoin can process about 7 transactions per second (TPS), while Ethereum handles around 30 TPS. Newer blockchains like Solana or Avalanche are faster, but scalability is still a challenge as transaction volume increases.

Hashgraph:

Hashgraph is incredibly fast compared to blockchain. It claims to handle up to 500,000 TPS in some cases. This makes it significantly more scalable, especially for large-scale applications.

Winner: 

Hashgraph takes the lead in speed and scalability due to its ability to process transactions in parallel rather than one at a time.

Consensus Mechanism

Blockchain:

Blockchain networks typically use consensus mechanisms and these methods are secure but can be resource-intensive. For example, PoW requires massive computational power, making it environmentally inefficient.

Hashgraph:

Hashgraph uses virtual voting and the gossip protocol, which are much more efficient. There’s no need for mining or staking, so it’s faster and consumes far fewer resources.

Winner: 

Hashgraph offers a more energy-efficient and faster consensus mechanism.

Security and Fairness

Blockchain:

Blockchain is incredibly secure due to its decentralized nature and immutability. However, fairness can sometimes be an issue. For example, in some PoS systems, validators with more stakes (coins) have more influence, leading to centralization risks.

Hashgraph:

Hashgraph provides a high level of security thanks to its consensus algorithms. It also claims to offer better fairness since no single node has the power to manipulate transaction ordering, unlike in some blockchain systems.

Winner: 

Both technologies are highly secure, but Hashgraph may offer better fairness in how it orders transactions.

Energy Efficiency

Blockchain:

Blockchain, especially Bitcoin’s PoW, is known for being energy-intensive. The computational power needed to mine new blocks can consume as much energy as entire countries. Newer blockchain systems like PoS are more efficient, but energy consumption is still a concern.

Hashgraph:

Since Hashgraph doesn’t require mining or staking, it’s far more energy-efficient. The gossip protocol and virtual voting require very little computational power, making it an eco-friendly alternative to blockchain.

Winner: 

Hashgraph is significantly more energy-efficient.

Maturity and Adoption

Blockchain:

Blockchain has been around since 2009 with the launch of Bitcoin. It’s widely adopted, powering not only cryptocurrencies but also decentralized applications, DeFi, and NFTs. Major industries from finance to supply chain management are experimenting with or have already implemented blockchain-based systems.

Hashgraph:

Hashgraph is relatively new in comparison and hasn’t seen the same level of adoption yet. However, it has shown potential, and platforms like Hedera Hashgraph are gaining attention for enterprise-grade applications.

Winner: 

Blockchain is more mature and widely adopted, but Hashgraph is emerging as a strong alternative.

Real-World Use Cases

Blockchain Use Cases:

Cryptocurrencies:

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptos rely on blockchain for secure, decentralized transaction processing.

Supply Chain Management:

Companies like Walmart use blockchain in supply chain management to track goods from manufacturer to consumer, ensuring transparency and reducing fraud.

Decentralized Finance:

Ethereum has led the charge in enabling DeFi applications, letting people borrow, lend, and trade without intermediaries like banks.

Hashgraph Use Cases:

Enterprise Solutions:

Hashgraph is primarily used for enterprise-level applications where speed and efficiency are critical. Hedera Hashgraph, for instance, works with industries like healthcare and logistics to provide faster, fairer, and more scalable solutions.

Microtransactions:

Hashgraph’s speed makes it ideal for microtransactions, where thousands of small payments need to be processed quickly and efficiently.

Data Integrity:

Hashgraph’s fairness and security make it an excellent choice for applications where data integrity is critical, such as in voting systems or fraud prevention.

Hashgraph or Blockchain – Which one should you choose?

Both Blockchain and Hashgraph offer unique advantages, but which one is better depends on what you’re looking for.

If you need a mature, widely adopted solution with a proven track record, Blockchain is your go-to. It’s secure, decentralized, and has an established blockchain ecosystem that spans cryptocurrencies, dApps, and more.

On the other hand, if you prioritize speed, scalability, and energy efficiency, Hashgraph is an exciting alternative. It has the potential to solve many of the issues blockchain faces today, especially in industries requiring high transaction throughput and minimal energy consumption.

Ultimately, the future of hashgraph vs blockchain may involve a mix of both, as developers continue to innovate and push the boundaries of what’s possible.

Related Articles

field image

The Changing Face of Digital Communication By 2024, messaging had already become the default medium for human interaction, with more than 4 billion global users relying on apps like WhatsApp, Slack, and Telegram for work and personal life. Yet, as adoption soared, so did concerns about data privacy, vendor lock-in, and compliance risks. The market […]

author-image

Calibraint

Author

11 Sep 2025

field image

The race to control the future of enterprise technology has shifted; it’s no longer about who owns the most servers or cloud storage, but who masters the Blockchain as a Service. Tech giants Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and IBM are transforming blockchain cloud services into ready-to-use platforms, making enterprise-grade blockchain accessible without the need for massive […]

author-image

Calibraint

Author

11 Sep 2025

field image

In luxury dining, experience has always been as important as cuisine. Guests expect curated menus, rare vintages, and flawless service. Yet in today’s digital-first world, they also expect proof. Where did the caviar come from? Was the truffle harvested sustainably? Is the champagne truly from the vineyard named on the label? These questions define trust […]

author-image

Calibraint

Author

08 Sep 2025

field image

Spam messages aren’t just irritating; they’re a reminder of how little control you have over traditional messaging apps. Every unwanted notification exists because your phone number and data are stored on centralized servers owned by corporations. That lack of control became clear in 2021, when WhatsApp announced an update to its privacy policy that allowed […]

author-image

Calibraint

Author

03 Sep 2025

field image

Social media once monetized your attention. SocialFi and decentralized social platforms flip that model, putting ownership and value back into users’ hands. Every post, interaction, or community can now generate rewards through tokens, NFTs, and governance participation. According to market research, the SocialFi market was valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2024 and is projected […]

author-image

Calibraint

Author

01 Sep 2025

field image

How prepared is today’s financial industry for an infrastructure revolution? According to McKinsey, the global demand for digital infrastructure is projected to reach $7 trillion by 2030, yet traditional models of building and maintaining it are struggling to keep pace with exponential digital growth. At the same time, blockchain adoption in financial services is accelerating […]

author-image

Calibraint

Author

26 Aug 2025

Let's Start A Conversation